Predictability,
Prediction & Applications
Interface Panel
last updated
February 28, 2008
Name
Affiliation
Service Through
Rajagopalan
Balaji
University
of Colorado
2009
Tom
Delworth
GFDL
2008
Lisa
Goddard
IRI
2009
Alex
Hall, co-chair
UCLA
2008
Wayne
HIggins
NOAA NCEP
2008
Ben
Kirtman, co-chair
COLA
2009
Randy
Koster
NASA
GSFC
2008
Arun
Kumar
NOAA
NCEP
2010
Jerry
Meehl
NCAR
2008
Kelly
Redmond
Desert
Research Institute
2008
Ning
Zeng
University
of Maryland
2010
MISSION STATEMENT: Our mission
is to foster improved practices in the provision, validation and uses of
climate information and forecasts through coordinated participation within
the U.S. and international climate science and applications communities.
PPAI GOALS
Further
fundamental understanding of climate predictability at seasonal to centennialtime
scales
Develop and promote standard
metrics and practices for evaluating predictability and prediction
Encourage coordinated U.S.
participation in emerging international multi-model predictiona nd attribution
activities
Quantify prediction uncertainty
and its sources
Assess predictability of key
climate forcings
Improve
provision of climate forecast information, particularly with respect
to drought and other extreme events
Assess baseline predictability
of drought on weeks to decades.
Coordinate and “advertise” scientific
support for multi-agency research efforts that address local and remote
sea-air-land mechanisms of drought and its predictability, at interannual
to decadal timescales(joint with GEWEX)
Assess possible future changes
in drought
Identify/collect/document monsoon
indices to observe and predict (help from POSP)
Assess baseline simulation
capability of complete annual cycle of global monsoon and its variability,
including diurnal component (help from PSMIP)
Assess baseline predictability
of identified monsoon indices
Quantify relative roles of
ocean/atmosphere and land/atmosphere processes (with POSP & PSMIP)
Assess potential future changes
of global monsoons
Foster
research and development of prediction systems for climate impacts on
ecosystems
Improve understanding of oceanic
and atmospheric patterns, and consequent forcing mechanisms, that organize
ecosystems and determine the spatial and temporal distribution of water
resources. (with PSMIP)
Quantify the predictability
of key oceanic and atmospheric processes that influence ecosystems and
water resources.
Develop tools for transforming
climate forecasts into ecosystem and water resource forecasts at lead
times from sub-seasonal to centennial and at appropriate spatial scales
Develop ability to quantify
relative contributions of anthropogenic climate change and natural climate
variability to observed long-term changes in ecosystems and water resources
Enable
use of CLIVAR science for improved decision support
Develop integrated linkages
to interdisciplinary programs: NOAA RISA and OGP, IRI, IPCC, CCSP,
NASA efforts, NSF NEON / CUAHSI / CLEANR / ORION, Ocean Observing
Systems, public entities such as WGA / NGA.
Promote/support projects
that link climate observations, forecasts, and scenarios with resource
assessments and forecasts
Promote sustained interactions
with other disciplines and research communities to ensure delivery
of “usable science”
Emphasize spatial and temporal
scales of information needed for applications. Contribute support
for the development, use, interpretation, and evaluation of tools
(e.g. downscaling) employed by applications.
Terms of Reference
Review, prioritize,
and coordinate US plans to characterize predictability, and demonstrate
improved prediction capabilities, on sub-seasonal, seasonal, S-I, decadal,
and century and longer time scales as necessary to achieve the goals of
CLIVAR.
Interface
with agency and CCSP activities and groups (e.g. NOAA-NMFS, IRI, and RISAs;
NASA-RESACs, RACs, and ESIPs) to identify user requirements for useful
climate information, improve the communication of these requirements, and
encourage development of appropriate tools and approaches for improved
decision support capabilities.
Coordinate US efforts
to insure advances in prediction research have appropriate connections
and pathways into operational forecast system development.
Develop and encourage
mechanisms (e.g. community workshops, commissioned studies, Working Groups)
to further the development and implementation of a research strategy,
including filling gaps. Advise on the adequacy and effectiveness of Working
Group plans and their implementation.
Advise US CLIVAR on
research priorities, identify research gaps, and develop suitable milestones
to promote funding opportunities. Help foster and coordinate
joint agency participation and support of relevant activities.
Publicize accomplishments
and demonstrated progress in research leading to improved prediction capabilities
and applications of prediction information.
Coordinate with other
national and international activities to develop integrated, efficient,
and effective overall international plans and activities.
Liaise with other
US CLIVAR panels and Working Groups to insure prediction is considered
in their efforts.
A36: Increasing Credibility of Climate Predictions
Conveners: Alex Hall, UCLA, Dept. of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences
Lisa Goddard,International Research Institute for Climate and Society, Columbia
University
The purpose of this session is to examine the credibility of state-of-the-art
climate predictions from seasonal to centennial time scales, with an eye toward
improving them. On seasonal to interannual time scales, prediction skill can
be evaluated statistically by comparing ongoing model predictions to the climate
record as it evolves. However, to improve predictions on these time scales, it
is necessary to identify and understand the physical mechanisms responsible for
predictability and ensure they are properly included in models. On the longer
time scales of climate change, it is challenging to evaluate prediction credibility,
let alone improve it. The variation of the past century is the only example of
forced climate change that has been adequately sampled on a global scale, so
rigorous evaluation of model performance is limited to this single realization.
Moreover, while current models give widely diverging predictions when identical
future forcing scenarios are imposed on them, are all able to simulate a “hindcast” of
the past century within observational constraints when realistic past forcing
is imposed. Unlike the seasonal to interannual case, the observed climate record
is of limited utility in determining which future projections are most realistic.
On these time scales, the community is therefore forced to rely almost exclusively
on the plausibility of the physical mechanisms underlying simulated climate change.
Because of the importance of physical mechanisms in establishing prediction credibility
and improving it on all time scales, we solicit papers that identify these mechanisms
or evaluate their plausibility. We also solicit work on statistical methods demonstrating
prediction reliability on seasonal to interannual time scales, and novel techniques
for assessing model credibility on longer time scales.