Predictability, Prediction & Applications
Interface Panel
last updated February 28, 2008

Name

Affiliation

Service Through

Rajagopalan Balaji

University of Colorado
2009

Tom Delworth

GFDL

2008
Lisa Goddard IRI
2009

Alex Hall, co-chair

UCLA

2008

Wayne HIggins

NOAA NCEP

2008
Ben Kirtman, co-chair COLA
2009
Randy Koster NASA GSFC
2008
Arun Kumar NOAA NCEP
2010
Jerry Meehl

NCAR

2008
Kelly Redmond Desert Research Institute
2008
Ning Zeng University of Maryland
2010

MISSION STATEMENT: Our mission is to foster improved practices in the provision, validation and uses of climate information and forecasts through coordinated participation within the U.S. and international climate science and applications communities.

PPAI GOALS

  1. Further fundamental understanding of climate predictability at seasonal to centennial time scales
  2. Improve provision of climate forecast information, particularly with respect to drought and other extreme events
  3. Foster research and development of prediction systems for climate impacts on ecosystems
  4. Enable use of CLIVAR science for improved decision support

Terms of Reference

The entire PPAI Strategic Plan can be found here.

References

Meetings

AGU Special Session - December 2006

PPAI Panel Meeting - December 14, 2006

A36:
Increasing Credibility of Climate Predictions
Conveners:
Alex Hall, UCLA, Dept. of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences
Lisa Goddard,
International Research Institute for Climate and Society, Columbia University
The purpose of this session is to examine the credibility of state-of-the-art climate predictions from seasonal to centennial time scales, with an eye toward improving them. On seasonal to interannual time scales, prediction skill can be evaluated statistically by comparing ongoing model predictions to the climate record as it evolves. However, to improve predictions on these time scales, it is necessary to identify and understand the physical mechanisms responsible for predictability and ensure they are properly included in models. On the longer time scales of climate change, it is challenging to evaluate prediction credibility, let alone improve it. The variation of the past century is the only example of forced climate change that has been adequately sampled on a global scale, so rigorous evaluation of model performance is limited to this single realization. Moreover, while current models give widely diverging predictions when identical future forcing scenarios are imposed on them, are all able to simulate a “hindcast” of the past century within observational constraints when realistic past forcing is imposed. Unlike the seasonal to interannual case, the observed climate record is of limited utility in determining which future projections are most realistic. On these time scales, the community is therefore forced to rely almost exclusively on the plausibility of the physical mechanisms underlying simulated climate change. Because of the importance of physical mechanisms in establishing prediction credibility and improving it on all time scales, we solicit papers that identify these mechanisms or evaluate their plausibility. We also solicit work on statistical methods demonstrating prediction reliability on seasonal to interannual time scales, and novel techniques for assessing model credibility on longer time scales.

U.S. CLIVAR Summit - 2007 July 23-25

U.S. CLIVAR Summit - 2006 July 26-28

Presentations from the Summit are provided:

U.S. CLIVAR Summit - 2005 August 15-18

The PPAI panel met in Keystone, Colorado to discuss ongoing and future panel activities. Presentations made to the panel are provided below.